logo
Volume 48, Issue 1 (6-2026)                   Athar 2026, 48(1): 29-55 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sajadi A. (2026). Re-identification of Falak-ol-Aflak Castle Based on Archaeological Excavations and Architectural Features. Athar. 48(1), 29-55. doi:10.66224/Athar.2085.1766.14
URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-2085-en.html
Iranian Center for Archaeological Research (ICAR), Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism (RICHT), Tehran, Iran. , sajadi.ali86@gmail.com
Abstract:   (598 Views)
Abstract
Falak-ol-Aflak Castle stands atop a natural bedrock outcrop in the center of the Khorramabad Valley. Throughout its turbulent history, this ancient fortress has undergone repeated phases of destruction and reconstruction. Consequently, its earliest structural phases have been lost, and its physical form has been so profoundly altered that archaeological investigation is essential for its historical re-identification. The existing literature on this structure relies chiefly on brief historical mentions or repetitive descriptions of its current state. To address this gap, this study employs archaeological excavation and a descriptive-comparative-analytical approach to interpret findings from stratigraphic soundings, thereby reconstructing the complex’s formation and structural evolution. Specifically, this paper addresses two key questions: (a) how was the initial structure established on the uneven rock topography? and (b) how did its architectural components and spatial configurations develop and expand over time? The findings indicate that the fortress underwent continuous physical transformations. To level the southern sections with the higher northern areas (conforming to the natural profile of the outcrop), the builders constructed a massive retaining wall, creating a flat foundation for the castle. Furthermore, this study reveals that a highly sophisticated engineering system was integrated within the fortress to manage water supply, distribution, and wastewater drainage.
Keywords: Fortress, Falak-ol-Aflak Castle (Shapurkhast Castle), Khorramabad, Architectural Evolution, Water Management.

Introduction
Falak-ol-Aflak Castle, one of Iran’s most prominent ancient fortresses, represents a continuous architectural trajectory of defense, protection, and restoration. Situated within the Khorramabad Valley, the fortress shares an intrinsic socio-spatial relationship with a network of surrounding historical settlements, most notably the ancient cities of Simashki, Shapurkhast, and Khorramabad. The historical longevity and strategic significance of this stronghold were dictated by three primary factors: highly favorable ecological conditions that sustained human settlement within the valley; a critical geographical position at the intersection of major transit routes connecting the central Iranian plateau with Mesopotamia and the southern and western regions; and key natural defensive features, characterized by a steep limestone cliff flanked by a river and encircled by mountain ridges. Consequently, this intersection of environmental and strategic advantages ensured long-term cultural continuity.
Depending on fluctuating socio-political dynamics, the castle assumed diverse administrative functions, serving successively as the seat of local governance for the Almuyids and the Pahla region during the Parthian and Sasanian eras; the governmental center of the Hasanuyid dynasty during the Buyid period; the administrative capital of the Atabeks of Lesser Lur during the Mongol and Ilkhanid periods; and, ultimately, the headquarters of the Governors (Wālīs) of Lorestan from the Safavid era until the late Qajar period. Utilizing a descriptive-analytical methodology grounded in archaeological and architectural data, this study investigates the construction and structural evolution of Falak-ol-Aflak Castle. Specifically, it addresses three primary research questions: (1) what taphonomic and construction processes shaped the formation of the fortress’s initial core; (2) what were the primary architectural components, spatial configurations, and subsequent phases of physical expansion; and (3) how were the internal water supply, distribution systems, and wastewater drainage networks organized and engineered over time?

Discussion
Geophysical studies indicate that the bedrock foundation of Falak-ol-Aflak Castle is highly irregular and sloped. These data confirm that the natural topography forms a longitudinal ridge with an east-west orientation, which gradually decreases in elevation from north to south along a gentle slope. Accordingly, throughout various historical periods, builders undertook extensive wall construction and foundation masonry on the eastern, southern, and southwestern sides to establish a level, uniform surface for the superstructure. In this regard, archaeological excavations and stratigraphic soundings (sondages) have verified the existence of multiple occupational horizons and enclosures within Falak-ol-Aflak Castle, dating from the Elamite and Median periods, through the medieval Islamic era, and up to the Qajar period.
Furthermore, archaeological excavations have revealed the hidden sub-surface layers of the castle’s water supply, distribution, and wastewater disposal systems, which were executed with remarkable engineering precision. Through accurate calculations, the designers of the hydraulic system managed to secure a sustainable and permanent water source by excavating a deep well directly into the bedrock. A key feature of this system is that, although the well opening was originally situated at the lowest point of the rock formation, the builders raised its operative height from −7 meters to +4.30 meters relative to the castle’s main floor level by constructing a robust stone and brick shaft wall. This artificial elevation enabled the gravity-fed distribution of water to all parts of the complex.
The extracted water was first directed into a regulation and distribution basin, from which it was channeled to the eastern and western sectors of the castle via two main ceramic pipelines (tanbūsheh). The western branch supplied the cisterns and the bathhouse located in the northwest corner of the first courtyard, while the eastern branch fed the pools situated in the second courtyard.
The wastewater disposal mechanism exhibited the same level of engineering sophistication. The system directed wastewater through ceramic pipes and channels toward five absorption wells, each measuring 888 to 999 meters in depth, strategically located at the corners of the castle. From these wells, the wastewater was channeled out of the castle grounds through brick-lined conduits. Archaeological evidence—including robust foundation work, the standardized arrangement and quality of the bricks, the specific mortars utilized, the protective plaster coverings over the channels and ceramic pipes, and the thickness of the pool walls—collectively attests to the high technical standards and structural reinforcement of these hydraulic features. Moreover, this sub-surface network served a dual function, providing both drainage and ventilation. By generating continuous airflow, it successfully mitigated rising dampness and kept the underlying structural layers dry.

Conclusion
Geophysical studies indicate that the bedrock foundation of Falak-ol-Aflak Castle is markedly sloped and irregular. The data confirm that the rock topography forms an elongated ridge with an east-west orientation, gradually decreasing in elevation from north to south along a gentle incline. Accordingly, builders in different historical periods employed retaining walls and foundation-leveling techniques on the eastern, southern, and southwestern sides in order to create a stable and uniform platform for construction. Archaeological excavations and stratigraphic trenches have substantiated the existence of multiple fortification walls dating from the Elamite and Median periods through the medieval Islamic era and into the Qajar period.
Furthermore, archaeological investigations have revealed sophisticated concealed systems for water supply, distribution, and wastewater management, all of which were designed with remarkable precision. Through careful calculations, the castle’s hydraulic engineers succeeded in establishing a permanent and sustainable water supply by excavating a well into the bedrock. A particularly notable engineering achievement concerns the location of the well mouth at the lowest point of the rock formation. To generate sufficient hydraulic head for water distribution throughout the castle, the builders constructed a stone-and-brick wall that raised the well mouth from −7 meters to +4.30 meters relative to the castle’s floor level. This engineered elevation enabled gravity-fed water flow to all areas of the castle.
The extracted water was first directed to a regulation and distribution basin and was then conveyed through two main ceramic pipeline systems to the eastern and western sections of the fortress. The western branch supplied the reservoirs and baths in the northwestern part of the first courtyard, while the eastern branch fed the basins in the second courtyard. The wastewater disposal system demonstrated a comparable level of engineering precision. Wastewater was directed through ceramic pipes and channels toward five absorption wells, each measuring 888 to 999 meters in depth and located at the corners of the castle, before being conveyed outside the complex through brick-lined channels.
Archaeological evidence—including robust foundation work, precise brickwork patterns, high-quality mortar compositions, protective linings for the channels, coatings for the ceramic pipes, and the thickness of the basin walls—attests to the advanced technical standards and structural reinforcement of these hydraulic installations. In addition, this subsurface network served the dual functions of drainage and ventilation. By facilitating air circulation, it helped control moisture and maintain the dryness of the underlying layers. The blockage of these channels in later periods has been identified as a primary cause of moisture infiltration into the upper layers and walls. Consequently, the complete reopening and restoration of this drainage network should be regarded as an essential measure for the sustainable preservation of the structure.
Full-Text [PDF 1287 kb]   (166 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Field Surveys and Exploration
Received: 2025/09/24 | Accepted: 2025/11/7 | Published: 2026/06/21

References
1. - ادموندز، جان سیسیل، (1362). یادداشت‌هایی درباره لرستان در دو سفرنامه درباره لرستان. ترجمۀ ل. بختیار ل و ا. سکندر، چاپ اول، تهران: بابک.
2. - امیرشاه کرمی، سیدعبدالعظیم؛ خزائی، جهانگیر؛ نومیری، مهدی؛ و مهدی‌آبادی، ملیحه، (1385). «تحلیل عددی اندرکنش قلعۀ فلک الافلاک با طرح مقاوم سازی بستر سنگی». مجموعه مقالات سومین کنفرانس سنگ ایران، https://civilica.com/doc/24970/
3. - ایزدپناه، حمید، (1362). آثار باستانی و تاریخی لرستان. جلد 1، چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات آگاه.
4. - بهرامی، محمد؛ سبزی، موسی؛ و توسلی، محمدمهدی، (1396). «مکان‌یابی جای نام سیماش، شاهک‌نشین الیپی در خرم‌آباد و امکان یکی دانستن آن با سیماشکی عیلامی». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی (دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه تهران)، 9 (1: پیاپی 15): 19-35. https://sid.ir/paper/506604/fa
5. - بهرامی، محمد؛ و سجادی، علی؛ و رجبی، نوروز، (1394). «گزارش دو فصل لایه‌نگاری تپه فلک‌الافلاک خرم‌آباد، لرستان». مجموعه مقالات دومین همایش ملی باستان‌شناسی ایران، به اهتمام: حسن هاشمی‌زرج‌آباد، بیرجند. https://civilica.com/doc/540983
6. - بی‌نام، (1370). جغرافیای لرستان پیشکوه و پشتکوه. چاپ اول، به کوشش: دکتر سکندر امان الهی بهاروند، تهران، انتشارات اداره کل فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی لرستان.
7. - پیرنیا، محمدکریم، (1387). آشنایی با معماری اسلامی ایران. تدوین: غلامحسین معماریان، تهران: انتشارات سروش دانا.
8. - خالو، علیرضا؛ و یکرنگ‌نیا، محمد، (1402). «ارزیابی میدانی و عددی آسیب‌پذیری لرزه‌ای قلعۀ فلک الافلاک». مهندسی سازه و ساخت، 10(6): 96-114. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2022.355829.2901
9. - دالوند، حمیدرضا، (1388). تاریخ و معماری دژ شاپور خواست (قلعۀ فلک الافلاک). چاپ اول، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع دستی و گردشگری.
10. - سجادی، علی، (1378). «گزارش کاوش لایه‌نگاری قلعۀ فلک‌الافلاک، گمانه شماره 2». مرکز اسناد میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری لرستان (منتشرنشده).
11. - سجادی، علی، (1383). «گزارش فصل اول کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی محوطه قلعه فلک افلاک». مرکز اسناد میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری لرستان، خرم‌آباد (منتشرنشده).
12. - سجادی، علی، (1384). «عنصر خشت در دژ شاپورخواست (قلعۀ فلک‌الافلاک)». مجموعه مقالات سومین کنگره تاریخ معماری و شهرسازی ایران، جلد 2، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور: 197- 228.
13. - سجادی، علی، (1386). «گزارش فصل نخست و دوم کاوش لایه‌نگاری محوطه داخلی». فلک‌الافلاک مرکز اسناد میراث‌فرهنگی و صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری لرستان، (منتشرنشده).
14. - سجادی، علی، (1390). «مکان‌یابی شهر شاپورخواست بر اساس منابع تاریخی و جغرافیایی». مزدک‌نامه (4) پژوهش‌های ایران‌شناسی، چاپ اول: 336-349. تهران: انتشارات اساطیر.
15. - سجادی، علی؛ و فرزین. علی‌رضا، (1382). قلعۀ فلک‌الافلاک / دژ شاپورخواست. چاپ اول، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی.
16. - سجادی، علی، (1387). «گزارش دو فصل کاوش لایه‌نگاری محوطه فلک‌الافلاک خرم‌آباد». مرکز اسناد میراث‌فرهنگی لرستان. (منتشرنشده).
17. - فرجامی، محمد؛ و محمودی‌نسب، علی‌اصغر، (۱۴۰۰). «شیوه‌های تأمین آب در دژهای قرون میانۀ دورۀ اسلامی در قهستان (استان خراسان جنوبی)». جامعه باستان‌شناسی ایران، (2): ۱۲۲-۱۰۶. https://independent.academia.edu/JOSIA
18. - مقدسی، محمد، (1374). «گزارش بررسی و گمانه‌زنی در قلعۀ فلک‌الافلاک». مرکز اسناد سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی استان لرستان (منتشرنشده).
19. - موسوی‌حاجی، سیدرسول؛ و بهرامی، محمد؛ و سجادی، علی، (1393). «شواهدی از وجود دژی مربوط به ایالت الیپی در لایه‌های زیرین قلعۀ فلک‌الافلاک خرم‌آباد، لرستان». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 4، (7): 81-94. https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_989.html
20. - مهریار، محمد؛ شامیل، فتح‌الله‌یف؛ فخاری تهرانی، فرهاد؛ و قدیری، بهرام، (1378). اسناد تصویری شهرهای ایرانی: دورۀ قاجار. چاپ اول، تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی و پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
21. - مهندسین مشاور خاک پایه، (1380).«مطالعات الکتریک قلعۀ فلک‌الافلاک». مرکز اسناد و مدارک میراث‌فرهنگی، کد RE7082.
22. - مؤمنی، کوروش؛ عطاریان، کوروش؛ و سلیمان‌نیا، احسان، (1395). «بازشناسی ویژگی‌های معماری قلعۀ فلک‌الافلاک». سومین کنگره بین‌المللی افق‌های جدید معماری و شهرسازی، تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/661777
24. References
25. - Abdi, Y., Sajadi, A. & Hassanpour, A., (2024). Experimental study on salt weathering of dolostones (case study: Falak-Ol-Aflak castle, Khorramabad, Iran). Carbonates and Evaporites, 39, 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-024-00995-w.
26. - Amirshah Karami, S. A., Khazaei, J., Nowmiri, M. & Mahdi Abadi, M., (2007). “Numerical analysis of the interaction of Falak-ol-Aflak Castle with the rock foundation reinforcement plan”. Third National Conference on Rehabilitation and Strengthening of Iran, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/24970 (in Persian).
27. - Anonymous, (1991). Geography of Lorestan: Pishkuh and Poshtkuh [Work originally published in 1300 AH]. (S. A. Baharvand, Ed.)., Tehran. Publications of the General Department of Culture and Islamic Guidance of Lorestan (in Persian).
28. - Bahrami, M., Sabzi, M. & Tavassoli, M. M., (2017). “Locating Simaš Kingdom of Ellipi in Khorram Abad, and the Possibility of Being One with Elamite Simaški”. Journal of Archaeological Studies (University of Tehran), 9(1): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2017.64003 (in Persian).
29. - Bahrami, M., Sajadi, A. & Rajabi, N., (2015). “Report on two seasons of stratigraphy of Falak-ol-Aflak Hill, Khorramabad, Lorestan”. In: H. Hashemi Zarjabad (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Archaeology of Iran: 1-11, Birjand. https://civilica.com/doc/540983. (in Persian).
30. - Bianca, S., (2007). Syria: Medieval Citadels Between East and West. Aga Khan Trust for Culture, Archived from the original on 4 June 2011, retrieved 24 July 2009.
31. - Dalvand, H. R., (2009). History and architecture of Shapur Khast Fortress (Falak-ol-Aflak Fortress). Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Research Institute. (in Persian).
32. - Diakonoff, I. M., (1956). The History of Media. Moscow-Leningrad (in Russian).
33. - Edmonds, C. J., (1362/1983). “Notes on Lurestan”. Dow Safarname dar bare-ye Lorestan, Trans. L. Bakhtuar & S. Amanollahi, Tehran: Babak. (in Persian).
34. - Farjami, M. & Mahmoodi Nasab, A. A., (2021). “Water management strategies in fortresses of medieval Islamic Quhistan, Khorasan South Province”. Journal of the Society for Iranian Archaeology, (2): 106–122. https://independent.academia.edu/JOSIA (in Persian).
35. - García-Pulido, L. J. & Martín, S. P., (2019). “The most advanced hydraulic techniques for water supply at the fortresses in the last period of Al-Andalus (thirteenth to fifteenth century)”. Arts, 8 (2): 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8020063. (in Persian).
36. - Goff, C. M., (1977). “Excavations at Baba Jan: The architecture of the East Mound, Levels II and III”. Iran, (15): 103–136.
37. - Gonnella, J., (2008). The Citadel of Aleppo: Description, History, Site Plan and Visitor Tour (Guidebook), Aga Khan Trust for Culture and the Syrian Directorate-General of Antiquities and Museums. archived from the original on 9 June 2012.
38. - Izadpanah, H., (1976). Āthār-e bāstāni va tārikhi-ye Lorestan [Lorestan Province archeological and historical antiquities] (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Agah Publications. (In Persian)
39. - Khakpay Consulting Engineers. (2001). “Electrical Studies of Falak-ul-Aflak Castle” (Report No. RE7082). Cultural Heritage Documentation Center, (Unpublished), (in Persian).
40. - Khalu, A. & Yekrangnia, M., (2023). Field and numerical assessment of the seismic vulnerability of Falak-ol-Aflak Castle”. Structural and Construction Engineering, 10 (6): 96–114. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2022.355829.2901
41. - Mehryar, M., Fathollahyev, S., Fakhari Tehrani, F. & Ghadiri, B., (1999). Visual Documents of Iranian Cities: The Qajar Period. Shahid Beheshti University and the Cultural Heritage Research Institute of the Country. (in Persian).
42. - Moghaddas, M., (1995). “Investigation and speculation in Falak-ol-Aflak Castle” [Unpublished report]. Document Center of Lorestan Province Cultural Heritage Organization. (in Persian).
43. - Momeni, K., Attarian, K. & Soleimannia, E., (2016). “Identifying the architectural features of Falak-ul-Aflak Castle”. Paper presented at the Third International Congress of New Horizons of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/661777 (in Persian).
44. - Mousavi Haji, S. R., Bahrami, M. & Sajadi, A., (2015). “Some evidence on the existence of Ellipi Castle underneath the Falak-ol-Aflak Castle, Khorramabad, Iran”. Pazhohesh-ha-ye Bastanshenasi Iran, 4 (7): 81–94. (in Persian).
45. - Pirniā, M., (2008). Iranian architectural stylistics. G. H. Memarian, Ed., Tehran: Soroush Danesh. (in Persian).
46. - Sajadi, A., (1999). “Report on the “Stratigraphic Excavation of Falak-ol-Aflak Castle, Trench No. 2’”. Lorestan Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts, and Tourism Organization Documentation Center. (Unpublished). (in Persian).
47. - Sajadi, A., (2004). “Report the first season of archaeological excavations at the site of Falak-ol-Aflak Castle”. Lorestan Cultural Heritage and Tourism Documentation Center, (Unpublished). (in Persian).
48. - Sajadi, A., (2006). “The mud-brick element in the fortress of Shapur-Khast (Falak-ol-Aflak Castle)”. In: Proceedings of the Third Congress on the History of Iranian Architecture and Urbanism (Vol. 2, pp. 197–228). Iran Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization (ICHTO). (in Persian).
49. - Sajadi, A., (2007). “Report on the first and second seasons of stratigraphic excavation at the internal area of Falak-ol-Aflak site”. Lorestan Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Documentation Center. (Unpublished). (in Persian).
50. - Sajadi, A., (2008). “Report of two seasons of stratigraphic excavation of the Falak-ul-Aflak site in Khorramabad”. Lorestan Cultural Heritage Documentation Center, (Unpublished). (in Persian).
51. - Sajadi, A., (2011). “Location of the city of Shapur Khast based on historical and geographical sources”. Mazdaknameh, (4): 336–349. Tehran, Asatir Publications. (in Persian).
52. - Sajadi, A. & Farzin, A., (2003). Falak-ul-Aflak Castle / Shapurkhast Fortress. Cultural Heritage Organization. Tehran. (in Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.