logo
Volume 48, Issue 1 (6-2026)                   Athar 2026, 48(1): 147-169 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mehdipour Moghaddam Z, Mohammadzadeh M. (2026). An Iconographic Study of Muharram Paintings in Colonial India Based on Erwin Panofsky’s Theory. Athar. 48(1), 147-169. doi:10.61882/Athar.2023.4068.1
URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-2023-en.html
1- Department of Industrial Arts, Faculty of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran (Corresponding Author). , z.mehdipour@umz.ac.ir
2- Department of Ceramics, Faculty of Fine Arts, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Abstract:   (18 Views)
Abstract
With the rise of British rule in India under the East India Company, a new style emerged in the paintings of indigenous artists. These works were commissioned and purchased by British officials and depicted the culture of the subcontinent’s inhabitants. Of particular significance is their tendency to record and document events with religious themes, especially the Muharram rituals in India. Accordingly, this study aims to examine the role of colonial culture in shaping Muharram-related artworks in India and, based on Panofsky’s three-stage iconological approach, to uncover their hidden meanings. More specifically, what implications did the inner content of Muharram-centered paintings have during the colonial era? The aim is to interpret the underlying meaning of these works, understand their symbolic values, and examine how the religious identity of Muslims is expressed in a society influenced by colonial culture. Iconology, by identifying elements that are unconsciously present in a work, can represent the worldview of the artists’ time—that is, the time and place of the image’s creation, the prevailing culture of that period and setting, and the demands of the patrons of art. The findings of this study, conducted using historical and descriptive-analytical methods, indicate that although Britain claimed to seek only the recording of Shiite mourning rituals in India and the collection of these paintings, it in fact regarded the revival of the Ashura movement as a threat because of its potential to incite uprisings among the inhabitants of the subcontinent. Therefore, by requesting that these events be documented, it sought to control Muslim gatherings throughout India. It should be noted that indigenous artists, in creating these works, unintentionally reshaped the identity of Muslims in the colonial era by using elements of Hindu-Islamic culture. This identity, which had been weakened by British hostility and its divide-and-rule policy between Hindus and Muslims, is now attracting attention in a different way and can be regarded as a tool for unity among Shiites, Sunnis, and non-Muslims in India in opposition to colonialism.
Keywords: Colonial India, Company School, Muharram Paintings, Muslim Identity, Iconology.
 
Introduction
Throughout history, religion has been an important part of the culture and lives of the people of India (Mahmoodi, 2023: 176). Among the major religions in this multicultural society, Islam influenced the culture and art of the region for centuries. It can be said that the spread of Islam in India was closely linked to the widespread religious rituals of mourning for Imam Hossein (Razavi, 2009: 8), which became more prominent during the Mughal era (Hosseini, 2010: 72). Thus, with the fall of their empire in the first half of the nineteenth century and the establishment of British dominance over India, attention to these rituals took on a different form. Although the British policy of “divide and rule” between Hindu and Muslim groups (Rahman et al., 2018: 4) weakened Shiite power, the Muharram events did not suddenly stop. Instead, alongside their observance, painters were able to play a key role in India’s colonial discourse by representing these mourning events in paintings. Such paintings, focused on Muharram, emerged as one of the topics of interest to Europeans and were commissioned by them and by officials of the East India Company (Howes, 2014: 371). It should be noted that after British dominance over India, a new style of painting known as the “Company School” emerged, and works with Ashura themes formed part of its output, reflecting many aspects of the culture and beliefs of the people of this land.

Materials and Method
From the perspective of its objective, the present study is a developmental, qualitative study conducted using historical and descriptive-analytical methods and library-based data collection, based on Panofsky’s iconological approach. The article examines the subject matter and hidden content in paintings centered on Muharram and mourning for Imam Hussein in colonial India. In this regard, the statistical population included 10 types of paintings depicting Muharram events. To avoid repetition and similarity, and based on data saturation, four samples were selected through purposive sampling and analyzed as the study corpus.

Discussion
Based on the interpretation of the symbolic visual elements in this body of works, and in line with the prevailing culture of the time and place, it was determined that the historical and social values embedded in Figures 1–4 were shaped by Hindu-Islamic culture and thought during the colonial era. Painters, driven by the need to satisfy new patrons and influenced by Orientalist discourse in the East, naturally incorporated these elements into their works. However, the political dimension of the paintings’ content from the perspective of Company officials should not be overlooked. In fact, Britain feared Muslim power from the moment of its arrival in India and attempted to marginalize Muslims through various policies (Mohammadi & Ashrafi, 2014: 194). To implement this policy, it sought to control mourning events, the observance of which during the month of Muharram was regarded as a threat to Britain’s presence in India (Siebenga, 2013: 25). From their perspective, such events could create an opportunity for rebellion against British colonialism. Consequently, Britain sought to display its absolute superiority and dominance over the land by expressing interest in paintings with these themes and by visually representing the mourning events for Imam Hussein, which were produced at the request and desire of the officials themselves (Siebenga, 2013: 25). In this way, it aimed to control Muslim gatherings and weaken their political and social power (Das, 2014: 212). On the other hand, since the establishment of British colonial rule, Indian Muslims had lost much of their influence in society (Mohammadi & Ashrafi, 2014: 194). This led some Sunnis to agree with Shiite views regarding the holding of mourning processions (Moinuddin, 1971: 3–4). It should also be noted that Hindus respectfully participated in these mourning events (Razavi, 2009: 7). Thus, based on the evidence in the paintings, Muharram events came to be recognized as a bridge of unity and consensus between the Shiite minority and other religious groups in India under British domination (Rabbani & Barani, 2016: 68).

Conclusion
Therefore, it can be said that the pictorial representation of Muharram mourning events, based on an iconological approach, was influenced by the conventional meanings prevalent in Indian society at that time, that is, the sociocultural text shaped by the British presence and the prominence of Muslims on the Indian art scene. On the one hand, after its arrival, Britain was to some extent captivated by life and the prevailing culture in India. In the style of Company School paintings, and with the aim of entertainment, documenting historical and religious events from its own perspective, and collecting these paintings, it commissioned local painters to record and document the subjects it selected, especially Muharram events. However, what is noteworthy in this regard is Britain’s aim of dominating Indians, especially Muslims, in this land. This was because Muslims, by resisting colonialism, were trying to save India from colonial invasion, which created concern among Company officials. As a result, Britain’s first political objective was to marginalize Muslims in India in order to create division between Hindus and Muslims. In fact, the observance of mourning events for Imam Hussein was perceived by colonial authorities as an alarm bell and as an opportunity to incite uprising and foster a spirit of heroism and sacrifice among the inhabitants of India. Therefore, they sought to control Muslim gatherings by commissioning paintings with these themes, thereby aiming to destroy Muslim culture and identity and present themselves as a superior and absolute identity. Thus, as observed in the paintings, although the execution technique, use of shading, and similar aspects were shaped according to British preferences, elements of Islamic culture, influenced by Iranian Shiite culture, alongside indigenous components of Indian culture, contributed to the re-formation of Muslim identity in the colonial era. Ultimately, the creation of paintings centered on mourning for Imam Hussein, in a combined Hindu-Islamic and European style, not only drew European attention to this subject but also provided an opportunity for Shiites to defend their identity as part of Islamic identity in the colonial era. This can be considered a tool for unity among Shiites, Sunnis, and non-Muslims in India in their struggle against colonialism.
     
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Archeology and History of Art
Received: 2025/08/2 | Accepted: 2025/10/4 | Published: 2026/06/21

References
1. - ابن سعد، محمد، (1418). الطبقات‌الکبری. جلد 6، بیروت: دارالکتب‌العلمیه.
2. - ابوالحسنی، علی، (1400). سیاه، رنگ پوشش، هیئت و عزا. مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهش‌های سیاسی. https://psri.ir/?id=e3fqdjy8vv. (تاریخ دسترسی: 5/ 1/ 1404).
3. - احمدی پیام، رضوان، (1387). «ریشه‌یابی نقوش گیاهی مشترک در قالی‌های ایران و هندوستان». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد، رشته پژوهش هنر، دانشکدۀ هنر، دانشگاه شاهد (منتشر نشده).
4. - آدامز، لوری، (۱۴۰۱). روش‌شناسی هنر. ترجمۀ علی معصومی، چاپ هفتم، تهران: مؤسسه فرهنگی پژوهشی چاپ و نشر نظر.
5. - الحسن، مشیر، (1367). جنبش اسلامی و گرایش‌های قومی در مستعمرۀ هند. ترجمۀ حسن لاهوتی، چاپ اول، مشهد: بنیاد پژوهش‌های اسلامی آستان قدس رضوی.
6. - بلخاری قهی، حسن، (1395). سرگذشت هنر در تمدن اسلامی (موسیقی و معماری). چاپ دوم، تهران: سوره مهر.
7. - پاکباز، رویین، (1390). دایره‌المعارف هنر. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
8. - بورکهارت، تیتوس، (1365). هنر اسلامی؛ زبان و بیان. ترجمۀ مسعود رجب‌نیا، چاپ اول، تهران: سروش.
9. - پانوفسکی، اروین، (1396). معنا در هنرهای تجسمی. ترجمۀ ندا اخوان اقدم. تهران: چشمه. https://taaghche.com/book/68777. (تاریخ دسترسی:‌ 1/ 10/ 1403).
10. - پرتوی، گلنار؛ و بهرامی‌بیرگانی، نوشین، (1395)، «جایگاه مفهوم رنگ آبی در نمادپردازی معماری اسلامی». دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی دستاوردهای نوین پژوهشی در عمران، معماری و مدیریت شهری، 30 اردیبهشت، دانشگاه جامع علمی- کاربردی، تهران.
11. - پیوند، شاهد؛ و پویان، علی، (1402). «بررسی نمایش اسلامی تعزیه در ایران و هند و تأثیر شکل‌دهی آن در تمدن اسلامی». سومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی معماری، عمران، شهرسازی، محیط‌زیست و افق‌های هنر اسلامی در بیانیه گام دوم انقلاب، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، 16 اسفند.
12. - جلالی، غلامرضا، (1389). «میراث اسلامی هند». مشکوه، 29 (1: پیاپی 106): 133- 117.
13. - حسینی، سید محمد شبیب، (1389). «عزاداران در هند از دیدگاه شرق‌شناسان (از دورۀ مغول تا عصر حاضر)». سخن، 8: 79- 70.
14. - حکمت، علی‌اصغر، (1337). سرزمین هند؛ بررسی تاریخی، اجتماعی، سیاسی و ادبی هندوستان از ادوار باستانی تا عصر حاضر. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
15. - دادور، ابوالقاسم؛ و منصوری، الهام، (1390). درآمدی بر اسطوره‌ها و نمادهای ایران و هند در عهد باستان. چاپ دوم، تهران: کلهر و دانشگاه الزهرا.
16. - دانش، کاظم؛ و خزایی، محمد، (1399). «نمادشناسی رنگ سبز در فرهنگ و هنر ایرانی- اسلامی». پیکره، 9 (19): 18- 29.
17. - دلبری، شهربانو؛ و زحمتکش، زهرا، (1395). «مقایسه برپایی مراسم عاشورا در ایران و هند (با تکیه بر شهر بنگلور)». پژوهش‌نامه معارف حسینی، 1 (4): 156- 127.
18. - دل‌زنده، سیامک، (1396). تحولات تصویری هنر ایران: بررسی انتقادی. چاپ دوم تهران: مؤسسه فرهنگی پژوهشی چاپ و نشر نظر.
19. - ذکرگو، امیرحسین، (1388). نمادشناسی هند شرق (1)؛ فیل در شمایل‌های هندویی و بودایی. چاپ اول، تهران: مؤسسۀ تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری متن؛ پژوهشکدۀ فرهنگستان هنر.
20. - ذکرگو، امیرحسین، (1394). اسطوره‌شناسی و هنر هند. تهران: مؤسسه تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری متن، چاپ اول.
21. - ربانی، محمدعلی؛ و بارانی، محمدرضا، (1394). «تأثیر سنت‌های محرم بر هویت اجتماعی شیعیان هند». مطالعات سیاسی جهان اسلام، 4 (16): 74- 57.
22. - رحمانی، جبار، (1391). مناسک و آیین‌های شیعی در هند. تهران: خیمه.
23. - رضوی، سید منظر عباس، (1388). «نقش شاهان اوده در گسترش تشیع». سخن تاریخ، 7: 13- 3.
24. - ساویس، نسیمه؛ و گلی، مهرناز، (1394). «محرم، عاشورا و آداب عزاداری». همایش سراسری شناخت اخلاق و آداب حسینی، تایباد: خراسان رضوی: 3 خرداد.
25. - شَلومو، ژان لوک، (1394). نظریه‌های هنر: فلسفه، نقد و تاریخ هنر از زمان افلاطون تا روزگار ما. ترجمۀ مصطفی گودرزی، تهران: ساقی، چاپ اول.
26. - شکوهی بیدهندی، محمدصالح؛ سریری، عاطفه؛ و طالبی بیدهندی، مریم، (1392). «الگوی رنگ در معابد و مساجد هند». هنر و تمدن شرق، 1 (2): 25- 18.
27. - صادقی، مصطفی، (1398). «تجهیزات جنگی امام حسین؟ع؟ و یارانش در واقعۀ عاشورا». تاریخ اسلام و ایران؛ دانشگاه الزهرا (س)، 29 (41): 69- 49.
28. - صدر، سید ابوالقاسم، (1388). دایره‌المعارف هنر. چاپ دوم، تهران: سیمای دانش و آذر.
29. - عاشورپور، صادق، (1389). نمایش‌های ایرانی. چاپ اول، جلد 2، تهران: سوره مهر.
30. - عبدی، ناهید، (1391). درآمدی بر آیکونولوژی؛ نظریه‌ها و کاربردها. تهران: سخن، چاپ اول.
31. - عزیزی، رویا؛ و طباطبایی جبلی، زهره، (1401). «آیکونوگرافی نقش خورشیدخانم در رودوزی‌های ایرانی و رابطۀ آن با چشم‌زخم (نمونه موردی: خورشید‌خانم‌های گنجینۀ کاخ صاحبقرانیه)». باغ نظر، 19 (114): 40- 27.
32. - کوپر؛ جی. سی، (1380). فرهنگ مصور نمادهای سنتی. ترجمۀ ملیحه کرباسیان، چاپ اول، تهران: فرشاد.
33. - گراوند، سعید؛ جبارپور، مریم؛ و مرندی، آذین، (1401). «حکمت و تفکر فلسفی هند». مطالعات علوم اسلامی انسانی، 8 (31): 50- 38.
34. - مجتبائی، فتح‌الله، (1389). پیوندهای فرهنگی ایران و هند در دورۀ اسلامی. ترجمۀ ابوالفضل محمودی، چاپ اول، تهران: مؤسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفۀ ایران.
35. - مجلسی، محمدباقربن محمدتقی، (1403). بحارالانوار. بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی، جلد 44.
36. - محمدی، محسن؛ و اشرافی، مرتضی، (1393). «بررسی و تبیین وضعیت علمی-فرهنگی مسلمانان هندوستان». جریان‌شناسی دینی معرفتی در عرصه بین‌الملل، 4: 218- 185.
37. - محمدزاده، مهدی، (۱۳۹۱). «نقد شمایل شناسانه و کاربرد آن در حوزه نقاشی مذهبی عصر قاجار». نقد نامه هنر، ۱: ۹۷-۱۰۸.
38. - محمدزاده، مهدی؛ ازهری، فریبا؛ و شکرپور، شهریار، (1401). «مطالعه شمایل‌شناسانه تصویر عصا در آثار محمد سیاه‌قلم با عصای آیینی لوهان‌ها، به روش اروین پانوفسکی». مبانی نظری هنرهای تجسمی، 7 (2):70- 54.
39. - محمودی، سکینه‌خاتون، (1402). «بازتاب عناصر قدرت و معنویت در پیکرنگاری‌های دورۀ گورکانیان هند». مطالعات شبه قاره، 15 (45): 184- 169.
40. - مختاریان، بهار، (1392). اهمیت آیکونوگرافی در پژوهش‌های اسطوره‌شناخنتی. https://anthropologyandculture.com. (تاریخ دسترسی: 5/ 1/ 1404)
41. - موسوی، سید اعظم، (1400). «آیکونولوژی نقوش برجسته دوران ساسانی از دیدگاه اروین پانوفسکی». پنجمین همایش ملی باستان‌شناسی ایران، دانشگاه بیرجند: 385- 371.
42. - مهدی‌پور مقدم، زهرا؛ محمدزاده، مهدی؛ و شکرپور، شهریار، (1401). «خوانش نقاشی دیواری داوری واپسین اثر جیوتو بر مبنای نظریه اروین پانوفسکی». رهپویه هنر؛ هنرهای تجسمی، 5(4): 97- 87.
43. - نصر، سید حسین (1389). هنر و معنویت اسلامی. ترجمۀ رحیم قاسمیان، چاپ اول، تهران: مؤسسه انتشارات حکمت.
44. - نصری، امیر، (1391). «خوانش تصویر از دیدگاه اروین پانوفسکی». کیمیای هنر، 1 (6): 20- 7.
45. - هال، جیمز، (1387). فرهنگ نگاره‌ای نمادها در هنر شرق و غرب. ترجمۀ رقیه بهزادی. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
47. References
48. - Aashorpour, S., (2010). Iranian Shows. Tehran: sooremehr, Vol 2. (in Persian)
49. - Abdi, N., (2012). An Introduction to Iconology: Theories and Applications. Tehran: sokhan. (in Persian)
50. - Abolhasani, A., (2021). Black; the color of attire, ceremony, and mourning. Political studirs and research institute. https://psri.ir/?id=e3fqdjy8vv (2025/ 3/ 25). (in Persian)
51. - Adams, L., (2022). The methodologies of art. Translated by: A. Maasoumi. Tehran: nazarpub. (in Persian)
52. - Ahmadi P, R., (2008). “Root Cause Analysis of Common Plant Motifs in Iranian and Indian Carpets”. Master's thesis, Shahed university. (in Persian)
53. - Alhajri, Kh., (2021). “Ta'ziyah Islamic theatre: the way to Europe”. Issues of theory and history, 4 (2): 88- 108.
54. - Azizi, R. & Tabatabaei, J. Z., (2022). “The Iconography of “Lady Sun (Khorshid Khanum)” Motif in Iranian Embroideries and its Relationship with the Evil Eye”. Bagh- e- Nazar, 19 (114): 27- 40. (in Persian)
55. - Barnard, N., (2008). Indian jewellery; The V&A collection. New Delhi: Timeless books.
56. - Bolkhari Ghahi, H., (2016). The History of Art in Islamic Civilization (Music and Architecture). Tehran: Sooremehr. (in Persian)
57. - Burckhardt, T., (1986). Art of Islam: language and meaning. Translated by: M. Rajabnia, Tehran: Soroush. (in Persian).
58. - Cooper, J. C., (2001). An illustrated encyclopaedia of traditional symbols. Translated by: M. Karbasian, Tehran: Farshad. (in Persian)
59. - Chalumeau, J. L., (2015). Les theories de l'art: philosophie, critique et histoire de l'art de Platon a nos jours. Translated by: M. Godarzi. Tehran: saghi. (in Persian)
60. - Chandra, B., (1971). Modern India. New Delhi: National council of educational research and training.
61. - Dadvar, A. & Mansori, E., (2011). An introduction to the ancient Persian and Indian mythology and symbols, Tehran: Kalhor and Alzahra university. (in Persian)
62. - Danesh, K. & Khazai. M., (2020). “The symbolism of green color in Iranian-Islamic culture and art”. Paykareh, 9 (19): 18- 29. (in Persian)
63. - Das, D., (2014). “Book reviews: Shia Islam in colonial India: religion, community and sectatianism”. Journal of south Asian development, 9 (2): 207-212.
64. - David, R., (2008). “Contemporary miniature painting in Lahore 1980- 2007”. PhD dissertation of Philosophy. Lahore college for women. University Lahore.
65. - Delbari, Sh. & Zahmatkesh, Z., (2016). “A Comparison of Ashura Ceremonies in Iran and India (with a focus on Bangalore)”. Journal of Husayni research studies, 1 (4): 127- 156. (in Persian).
66. - Delzendeh, S., (2017). Visual Transformations of Iranian Art: A Critical Examination. Tehran: Nazarpub. (in Persian)
67. - Drabu, O. & Jha, P., (2018). Muharram in the 19th century: Indian paintings. British inagination. https://www.dawn.com/news/1433872. (1403 / 8 / 20)
68. - Geravand, S., Jabarpour, M. & Marandi, A., (2022). “Indian Wisdom and Philosophical Thought”. Research in Humanities Islamic, 8 (31): 38- 50. (in Persian)
69. - Hall, J., (2008). Illustrated dictionary of symbols in eastern and western art. Translated by: R. Behzadi, Tehran: Contemporary culture. (in Persian)
70. - Hasan, M., (1988). Islamic Movement and Ethnic Tendencies in Colonial India. Translated by: H. Lahoti. Mashhad: Islamic Research Foundation of Astane Quds Razavi. (in Persian)
71. - Hekmat, A., (1958). The land of India; A historical, social, political, and literary study of India from ancient times to the present era. Tehran: university of Tehran. (in Persian)
72. - Hosseini, S. M., (2010). “Mourners in India from the Perspective of Orientalists (from the Mughal Era to the Present Day)”. Sokhan, 8: 70- 79. (in Persian)
73. - Howes, J., (2014). Indian company school art from 1780 to 1820: collecting versus documenting, From the book Collection of Articles: In the shadow of the golden age: art and identity in Asia from Gandhara to the modern age. by Julia A. B. Hegewald, vol. 1, the University of Bonn, Germany: Studies in Asian art and culture (SAAC).
74. - Ibn Sa’d, M., (1997). Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra. Beirut: dar al- ilmiyah, vol 6. (in Persian)
75. - Islamia, J. M., (2014). Company art. AJK- Mass communication research center.
76. - Jalali, Gh. R., (2010). “Phenomenology of Literalism in the Understanding of the Qur’an”. Mishkat, 29 (1): 117- 133.
77. - Keenan, D. l., (2014). “Culture and acculturation: Erwin Panofsky in the United States of America”. PhD dissertation. history of art. university of Glasgow.
78. - Lorenz, K., (2016). Ancient mythological images and their interpretation on introduction to Iconology, semiotics and image studies in classical art history. New York: Cambridge university press.
79. - Mahmoodi, S., (2023). “Reflection of the Elements of Authority and Spirituality in the Mughal Empire Portraiture”. Journal of subcontinent researches, 15 (45): 169- 184. (in Persian)
80. - Majlesi, M. B., (1983). Bihar al-Anwar. Vol. 44. Beirut: House of Revival of Arab Heritage. (in Persian).
81. - Mehdipour M, Z., Mahammadzadeh, M. & 7 Shokpour, Sh., (2023). “Reading the Mural The Last Judgment by Giotto Based on the Theory of Ervin Panofsky”. Rahpooye journal of visual arts, 5 (4): 87- 97. (in Persian)
82. - Mohammadzadeh, M., (2012). “Iconographic Criticism and Its Application in the Field of Religious Painting of the Qajar Era”. Naqdname-ye Honar, 1: 97–108 (in persian).
83. - Mohammadi, M. & Ashrafi, M., (2014). “Investigation and Explanation of the Scientific-Cultural Status of Muslims in India”. Religious-Epistemological Currents in the International Arena, 4: 185- 218. (in Persian).
84. - Mohammadzadeh, M., Azhari, F. & Shokrpour, Sh., (2022). “Iconology Study of the Image of a Cane in the Works of Mohammad Siyah Qalam”. Iranian scientific association of visual arts, 7 (2): 54- 70. (in Persian)
85. - Moinuddin, K., (1971). A monograph on Muharra. India: Andhra predesh census of India.
86. - Mokhtarian, B., (2013). The Importance of Iconography in Mythological Research. https://anthropologyandculture.com (25/ 3/ 2025). (in Persian).
87. - Mosavi, S. A., (2021). “Iconography of Sasanian Rock Reliefs from the Perspective of Erwin Panofsky”. Fifth National Conference on Archeology of Iran. University of Birjand: 371- 385. (in Persian)
88. - Mujtabai, F., (2010). Hindu Muslim cultural relations. Translated by: A. Mahmudi. Tehran: ministery of science, research and technology Iranian institute pf philosophy. (in Persian)
89. - Nasr, S. H., (2010). Islamic art spirituality. Translated by: R. Ghasemian. Tehran: Hekmat. (in Persian).
90. - Nasri, A., (2013). “Reading Image with Erwin Panofsky”. Kimiahonar, 1 (6): 7- 20. (in Persian)
91. - Pakbaz, R., (2011). Encyclopedia of art. Tehran: farhangmoaser. (in Persian)
92. - Panofsky, E., (1955). Meaning in the visual arts. New York: Doubleday anchor books.
93. - Panofsky, E., (1972). Studies in Iconology humanistic themes in the art of the Renaissance. New York: harper and row.
94. - Panofsky, E., (2017). What art is. Translated by: N. Akhavan A. Tehran: cheshmeh. https://taaghche.com/book/68777. (1/ 10/ 1403). (in Persian)
95. - Partoovi, G. & Bahrami, N., (2016). “The Position of the Concept of Blue Color in Islamic Architectural Symbolism”. The Second International Conference on New Research Findings in Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Management, Tehran. (in Persian)
96. - Peyvand, Sh. & Pouyan, A., (2023). “A study of the Islamic performance of Ta'zieh in Iran and India and its shaping influence on Islamic civilization”. 3rd.International Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Development, Environment and Horizons of Islamic Art in the Second Step Statement of the Revolution. Tabriz Islamic art university, Tabriz. (in Persian)
97. - Rabbani, M. A. & Barani, M R., (2016). “The Impact of Rituals of Moharram on Social Identity of the Shiites in India”. Political studies of Islamic world, 4 (16): 57- 74. (in Persian)
98. - Rahman, A., Ali, M. & Kahn, S., (2018). “The British art of colonialism in India: sunjugation and division”. Peace and conflict studies, 25 (1): 1- 26.
99. - Rahmani, J., (2012). Shi'a rituals and rituals in India. Tehran: Kheime. (in Persian)
100. - Razavi. S. M A., (2009). “The Role of the Kings of Awadh in the Expansion of Shiism”. Sokhanetarikh, 7: 3- 13. (in Persian)
101. - Sadeghi, M., (2019). “Weapons of Hussein ibn Ali and his Companions in Karbala”. History of Islam and Iran, 29 (41): 49- 69. (in Persian).
102. - Sadr, S. A., (2009). Encyclopedia of art. Tehran: simayedanesh & azar. (in Persian)
103. - Savis, N. & Goli, M., (2015). Muharram, Ashura, and Mourning Rituals. Hosseini's ethics and etiquette, Taybad: Razavi Khorasan Province. (in Persian)
104. - Shokouhibidhendi, M S., Sariri, A. & Talebi, M., (2014). “The pattern of colors in the Indian temples and mosques”. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 1 (2): 18- 25. (in Persian)
105. - Siebenga, R., (2013). “Picturing Muharram: images of a Colonial, spectacle 1870- 1915”. journal of south Asian studies, 36 (4): 626- 643.
106. - Stronge, S., Smith, N. & Harle, J. C., (1988). A golden treasury: Jewellery from the Indian subcontinent. New York: Rizzoli international publications in association with the Victoria and Albert Museum and Grantha corporation.
107. - Tharoor, Sh., (2016). An era of darkness: the British empire in India. New Delhi: Aleph book company.
108. - Zekrgoo, A. H., (2014). Symbolism in oriental arts 1: elephant in Hindu & Buddhist iconography. Tehran: matn. (in Persian)
109. - Zekrgoo, A. H., (2015). Indian Mythology and art. Tehran: matn. (in Persian)
110. - URL 1: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mec/2018/09/17/studying-sectarianism-while-beating-dead-horses-and-searching-for-third-ways/. (1403/ 8/ 31).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.